Saturday was Birmingham Book Festival’s second annual Writers’ Toolkit Conference, held at South Birmingham College. The event offers “a unique opportunity to learn about the aspects of the business of being a writer and network with others writing and working in literature development through a mixture of panel discussions and Q&A sessions.”
Before I left for the day, I checked my Twitter feed to find out who was going and if I could connect to anyone in advance. Found 3 mentions of it from@bhambookfest, @eastkentlivelit and @danlawson, essentially saying they were looking forward to the event and raring to go. Did a quick shout out with the hashtag #writerstoolkit to get the ball rolling.
Sitting in the opening session, Jonathan Davidson (Birmingham Book Festival Director) made a number of points that would have made excellent soundbites to kick-start discussion. Comparing the conference to the re-booted Hadron Collider, for example. It was a great analogy, likening the spread and exchange of information to atomic particles that would connect and alter/ re-form on impact.
But I was reluctant to start tweeting mid-presentation for the basic fact that it would look rather rude. Self-conciousness kicked in as I realised that sitting mid-row fiddling with a mobile phone would be not the done thing. And no-one else was doing it. Which was a shame, because it would have provided another useful point of connection.
GetAmbition hosted a number of roadshows across the country earlier this year, to promote the use of social media in arts organisations. As a relative newcomer to all things Twitter, I was interested to see the number of laptops and iphones being deployed during presentations, and even more intrigued to see the live Twitter feed popping up on the big screen, responding to what the speaker was saying, asking questions, and generally contributing to the conversation. The speaker in turn, would respond to the points being made online, so the level of interaction was heightened and given extra dimension.
The thing I most often liken this to is BBC Question Time. Ever since uni, I’ve been watching this with Teletext (p.155 for the uninitiated) to read the comments and responses from “Gerald, Bournemouth” etc. It adds interest and value to the conversation, albeit in a BBC editorially-controlled kind of way. Yes, you do tend to get disparaging comments about the colour of Dimbleby’s tie, or (my recent favourite) how Will Self’s facial hair makes him look like a sexier version of Terry Waite, but this only adds to the entertainment.
Teletext, however, has its limitations and this kind of meta-conversation is best conducted via a hosting service such as Twitter, where contributors can comment and ask questions, but even better, can start answering others and create a whole new debate in parallel with the one that’s being conducted “above the surface”, between speaker and audience. The audience becomes a participant in the conversation; an initiator rather than a reactor. We’re back to the Collider again…
There was a recent example of how this can work at Birmingham’s Hello Digital conference. One of the participants was deaf and required BSL Interpretation, which the organisers had unfortunately failed to book. The participant tweeted her frustration and several other delegates “re-tweeted” her concerns. The conversation was picked up by another conference being held at the same time on Disability Hate Crimes, and provided an additional topic of discussion at that event. This is a strong example of Twitter connecting people, raising issues and creating a conversation where none would be had otherwise. The spontaneity and immediacy of the dialogue is a key factor in Twitter’s value.
At the Writers’ Toolkit, I was looking forward to the Social Networking panel discussion promoting the use of technology and how it can help writers connect and collaborate.
Part 2 to follow…






Nick Hornby